
ST. PAUL, Minn. (AP) — A Minnesota jury awarded $65.5 million on Friday to a mother of three who claimed talcum products made by Johnson & Johnson exposed her to asbestos and contributed to her developing cancer in the lining of her lungs.
Jurors determined that plaintiff Anna Jean Houghton Carley, 37, should be compensated by Johnson & Johnson after using its baby powder throughout her childhood and later developing mesothelioma, an aggressive cancer caused primarily by exposure to the carcinogen asbestos.
Johnson & Johnson said it would appeal the verdict.
During a 13-day trial in Ramsey County District Court, Carley's legal team argued the pharmaceutical giant sold and marketed talc-based products to consumers despite knowing it can be contaminated with asbestos. Carley's lawyers also said her family was never warned about potential dangers while using the product on their child. The product was taken off shelves in the U.S. in 2020.
“This case was not about compensation only. It was about truth and accountability," Carley's attorney Ben Braly said.
Erik Haas, worldwide vice president of litigation for Johnson & Johnson, argued the company's baby powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer. He expects an appellate court to reverse the decision.
The verdict is the latest development in a longstanding legal battle over claims that talc in Johnson’s Baby Powder and Shower to Shower body powder was connected to ovarian cancer and mesothelioma, which strikes the lungs and other organs. Johnson & Johnson stopped selling powder made with talc worldwide in 2023.
“These lawsuits are predicated on ‘junk science,’ refuted by decades of studies that demonstrate Johnson & Johnson’s Baby Powder is safe, does not contain asbestos and does not cause cancer,” Haas said in a statement after the verdict.
Earlier this month, a Los Angeles jury awarded $40 million to two women who claimed Johnson & Johnson's talcum powder caused their ovarian cancer. And in October, another California jury ordered the company to pay $966 million to the family of a woman who died of mesothelioma, claiming she developed the cancer because the baby powder she used was contaminated with asbestos.
LATEST POSTS
- 1
The Best Computer games for Multiplayer Fun - 2
The 3 little words TV fans can't stop obsessing over - 3
Several killed in Ukraine and Russia after cross-border attacks - 4
Scientists captured female sperm whales on video working together during a birth to protect the calf - 5
Rick Steves' Favorite Time To Visit Spain Has Lower Prices And Fewer Crowds
Israel intensifies Lebanon attacks and hits areas not in Hezbollah's control
Senegal president signs tough new anti-LGBT law doubling jail terms
How Mars' ancient lakes grew shields of ice to stay warm as the Red Planet froze
These men carry towers of birds through Mexico's streets. They say their tradition is dying out.
5 Indoor Plants That Further develop Air Quality
Nigeria’s return to Windsor castle signals new era in UK economic partnership
Jupiter and the moon take a sunset stroll on March 26. Here's how to see it
Met Gala 2026 will celebrate fashion as an 'embodied art form': A guide to the theme, dress code, cochairs and hosting committee of the starry event
The most effective method to Pick the Best Wellbeing Highlights for Seniors in SUVs













